Outline

Ingegneria Sismica

Ingegneria Sismica

Ultimate limit state resistance of R.C. sections subjected to axial force and uniaxial bending moment

Author(s): Laura Liberatore
, Laura Liberatore. “Ultimate limit state resistance of R.C. sections subjected to axial force and uniaxial bending moment.” Ingegneria Sismica Volume 24 Issue 3: -, doi:….

Abstract

In this paper, the ultimate limit state resistance of RC sections subjected to axial force and uniaxial bending moment is evaluated, both by means of non linear analyses, which take into account the effect of the confining reinforcement and the degradation of the concrete in the post-elastic range, and according to the Italian code, i.e. considering a stress-strain curve for the concrete with an ultimate compressive strain of 3,5‰ and a design value of compressive strength equal to the characteristic value reduced by means of two factors: the partial safety factor and a coefficient taking account of long term effects and of unfavourable effects resulting from the way the load is applied.
The partial factor values adopted for the fundamental combination (gc = 1,6 for concrete and gs = 1,15 for steel) must be applied also for the seismic design so as to take into account the possible strength degradation of the materials due to the cyclic deformations. The adoption of these values and of the factor for long term effects, equal to 0,85, affects the evaluation of the bending resistance and, consequently, the cross section design. To evaluate the influence of these factors on the resistances, the latter are also calculated varying the design value of the concrete compressive strength.
A comparison between the resistances computed in the aforementioned ways is performed, evaluating also the influence of different parameters, such as the cross sectional dimension, the ratio between bending moment and axial force, the amount of longitudinal and transversal reinforcement.
Available in Italian only

Related Articles

E. Brunesi1, S. Peloso1, R. Pinho1,2, R. Nascimbene3
1EUCENTRE, European Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake Engineering Via Ferrata 1, 27100 Pavia, Italy
2Dept. of Civil Engineering and Architecture (DICAr), University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 3, Pavia 27100, Italy
3Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS Pavia Piazza della Vittoria 15, 27100 Pavia, Italy
R. Arvind1, M. Helen Santhi1, G. Malathi2, Huseyin Bilgin3
1School of Civil Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
2School of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
3Civil (Structural) Engineering, Epoka University, Tirana / Albania
Ali Ekber Sever1, Yakup Hakan Aydin2, Pinar Usta Evci1
1Department of Civil Engineering, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, 32260 Isparta, Turkey
2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, 32260 Isparta, Turkey
Hayri Baytan Ozmen1, Esra Ozer2
1Department of Civil Engineering, Usak University, 64200 Usak, Turkey
2Department of Civil Engineering, Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University, 60250 Tokat, Turkey
Hamid Beiraghi1, Abolfazl Riahi Nouri2
1Department of Civil Engineering, Mahdishahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mahdishahr, Iran
2Department of Civil Engineering, West Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran