Outline

Ingegneria Sismica

Ingegneria Sismica

Linear methods for the seismic vulnerability analysis of R.C. buildings

Author(s): Biagio Pisano
, Biagio Pisano. “Linear methods for the seismic vulnerability analysis of R.C. buildings.” Ingegneria Sismica Volume 29 Issue 1: -, doi:….

Abstract

Checking the seismic safety of existing structures is a complex task, mainly due to uncertainities connected with material properties, loads and structural geometry. Before O.P.C.M. 3274, with the exception of applications to masonry buildings (and after important seismic events), no italian code has defined methods specifically devoted to existing, structures considering also r.c. buildings. included. The real novelty of new code applications consists in the development of reliable and applicable produres for the analysis of existing structures, especially of the reinforced concrete ones. The more credited methods (also for practical purposes) may be divided into two classes: linear and non linear ones (among them pushover analysis). These methods may be applied either to static analysis and to dynamic analysis. Static analysis is carried out by assigning a standard distribution of lateral forces along the heigth of the considered building following the assumed shape of “first vibration mode” of regular structures. Dynamic analysis enables to analyze also geometrically articulated structures by considering modal shapes derived from eigenvectors and eigenvalues of a generalized system. The methods are shortly, with particular emphasis on the linear one, in order to estimate the ultimate PGA for the considered structure. This method represents an appropriate compromise between reliability and rapidity of calculations. By using design spectrum with behaviour factor q, it is possible to consider, for existing buildings, a minimum value of ductility.

Related Articles

E. Brunesi1, S. Peloso1, R. Pinho1,2, R. Nascimbene3
1EUCENTRE, European Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake Engineering Via Ferrata 1, 27100 Pavia, Italy
2Dept. of Civil Engineering and Architecture (DICAr), University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 3, Pavia 27100, Italy
3Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS Pavia Piazza della Vittoria 15, 27100 Pavia, Italy
R. Arvind1, M. Helen Santhi1, G. Malathi2, Huseyin Bilgin3
1School of Civil Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
2School of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
3Civil (Structural) Engineering, Epoka University, Tirana / Albania
Ali Ekber Sever1, Yakup Hakan Aydin2, Pinar Usta Evci1
1Department of Civil Engineering, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, 32260 Isparta, Turkey
2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, 32260 Isparta, Turkey
Hayri Baytan Ozmen1, Esra Ozer2
1Department of Civil Engineering, Usak University, 64200 Usak, Turkey
2Department of Civil Engineering, Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University, 60250 Tokat, Turkey
Hamid Beiraghi1, Abolfazl Riahi Nouri2
1Department of Civil Engineering, Mahdishahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mahdishahr, Iran
2Department of Civil Engineering, West Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran