Outline

Ingegneria Sismica

Ingegneria Sismica

Optimizing shape memory alloy rebar layouts for retrofitting a substandard RC frame

Author(s): Yunus Demirtas1,2, Ozgur Avsar2
1Civil Engineering Department, Usak University, 64200 Usak, Türkiye
2Civil Engineering Department, Eskisehir Technical University, 26555 Eskisehir, Türkiye
Demirtas, Yunus . and Avsar, Ozgur . “Optimizing shape memory alloy rebar layouts for retrofitting a substandard RC frame.” Ingegneria Sismica Volume 42 Issue 4: 1-17, doi:10.65102/is202541.

Abstract

Retrofitting substandard reinforced concrete (RC) buildings is essential to reduce collapse risk during high-intensity earthquakes. Among advanced retrofitting methods, shape memory alloy (SMA) bars have emerged as a replacement for steel reinforcement at critical structural components. Owing to their superelastic properties, SMA materials can recover from plastic deformations within specific strain limits, which helps reduce post-earthquake residual displacements. However, the high cost of SMA compared to conventional materials limits their widespread use. This study analytically investigates various SMA rebar configurations placed at the plastic hinge regions of first-story columns in a previously tested substandard RC frame. A lattice modeling technique implemented in OpenSees was employed to simulate the nonlinear behavior of concrete and reinforcement, modeled as truss elements, under pseudo-dynamic ground motion records. Four different SMA layouts using Ni-Ti and Cu-Al-Mn alloys were evaluated. Comparisons of peak and residual interstory drift ratios revealed that certain partial SMA configurations can reduce residual drifts by up to 65% with minimal material usage. The optimization results suggest that the effectiveness of SMA retrofitting depends not only on the quantity but also on the positioning of SMA rebars. The ideal configuration is the one that achieves the greatest reduction in both peak and residual displacements while using the least amount of SMA material.

Keywords
shape memory alloy, smart material, retrofitting, cost-efficiency, lattice modelling, substandard

Related Articles

Mohamed A. Tohamy1, Mostafa M. ElSayed1, Adel. Y. Akl1
1Department of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, 12613 Giza, Egypt
Mehmet Yigitbas1, Ernesto Grande1, Maura Imbimbo1
1Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043, Cassino FR, Italy
Yan Shi1, Xuexin Wang1, Qianzhan Cheng1, Zhao Cheng1
1School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, 730050 Lanzhou, China
Alper Demirci1, Semanur Kenar2
1Faculty of Engineering, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, 17100, Çanakkale, Türkiye
2School of Graduate Studies, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, 17100, Çanakkale, Türkiye
Guoxi Fan1, Boyuan Guo1, Peng Hu2, Shirui Sun1, Haozhe Zhang1, Lu Yu1, Xiaocheng Tang3
1College of Engineering, Ocean University of China, 266404 Qingdao, Shandong, China
2Shanghai Baoye Group Co., Ltd., 200941 Shanghai, China
3School of Civil Engineering, Jilin Jianzhu University, 130118 Changchun, Jilin, China