Outline

Ingegneria Sismica

Ingegneria Sismica

ANALYSIS OF THE MONOLITHIC AND SEGMENTAL TUNNEL LINING UNDER EARTHQUAKE LOADING

, Rouhollah Basirat., , Hossein Salari-rad., and , Hamed Molladavoodi. “ANALYSIS OF THE MONOLITHIC AND SEGMENTAL TUNNEL LINING UNDER EARTHQUAKE LOADING.” Ingegneria Sismica Volume 36 Issue 4: 140-154, doi:….

Abstract

In this comprehensive study, the effect of the interaction between tunnel lining and the surrounding medium on the monolithic tunnel lining (MTL) under earthquake loading is investigated using different methods including five analytical methods, quasi-static approach, and numerical simulation (time history) under full-slip and no-slip conditions considering. The results showed that the stress induced by seismic loads in tunnel lining in no-slip condition is approximately three times higher than that in the full-slip condition. The results also presented that numerical and quasi-static methods have a meaningful agreement with analytical methods under both conditions. In the next step, dynamic analysis of segmental tunnel lining (STL) was performed using Discrete Element Method (DEM), and the results was compared with the monolithic lining.. The resultsindicated that maximum stress in the MTL is more than STL, while the maximum strain in MTL is less than that in STL. This is occurred because joints in segmental lining reduce the lining stiffness. In other words, the rigidity increase in the supporting system is associated with a flexibility decrease in the lining with respect to rock medium.

Related Articles

E. Brunesi1, S. Peloso1, R. Pinho1,2, R. Nascimbene3
1EUCENTRE, European Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake Engineering Via Ferrata 1, 27100 Pavia, Italy
2Dept. of Civil Engineering and Architecture (DICAr), University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 3, Pavia 27100, Italy
3Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS Pavia Piazza della Vittoria 15, 27100 Pavia, Italy
R. Arvind1, M. Helen Santhi1, G. Malathi2, Huseyin Bilgin3
1School of Civil Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
2School of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
3Civil (Structural) Engineering, Epoka University, Tirana / Albania
Ali Ekber Sever1, Yakup Hakan Aydin2, Pinar Usta Evci1
1Department of Civil Engineering, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, 32260 Isparta, Turkey
2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, 32260 Isparta, Turkey
Hayri Baytan Ozmen1, Esra Ozer2
1Department of Civil Engineering, Usak University, 64200 Usak, Turkey
2Department of Civil Engineering, Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University, 60250 Tokat, Turkey
Hamid Beiraghi1, Abolfazl Riahi Nouri2
1Department of Civil Engineering, Mahdishahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mahdishahr, Iran
2Department of Civil Engineering, West Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran