Outline

Ingegneria Sismica

Ingegneria Sismica

Quantum Encryption Techniques for Securing Low-Voltage Communication Systems in Next-Generation Data Transmission Networks

Author(s): Erwei Tian1, Jianbin Zhang1, Tianjian Zhao1
1State Grid Zhejiang Electric Power Co., Ltd. Shaoxing Power Supply Company, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, 311800, China
Tian, Erwei ., Zhang, Jianbin ., and Zhao, Tianjian . “Quantum Encryption Techniques for Securing Low-Voltage Communication Systems in Next-Generation Data Transmission Networks.” Ingegneria Sismica Volume 43 Issue 2: 1-18, doi:10.65102/is20261017.

Abstract

Low-voltage communication systems in next-generation data transmission networks connect smart meters, feeder controllers, EV chargers, and distributed energy resources; however, the dense topological structure they have and the limited abilities of their endpoints make the direct deployment on quantum hardware be not practical. In order to solve this restriction, this article puts forward a Hybrid Quantum Encryption Scheme for Low-Voltage Systems (HQES-LV), which keeps quantum key distribution on backbone and gateway layers, uses a post-quantum authenticated control plane, and gives lightweight session protection to edge devices by means of risk-adaptive key renewal. A literature-calibrated digital twin is constructed to simulate mixed control, telemetry, and maintenance traffic, along with replay attacks, man-in-the-middle probing, quantum channel degradation, and gateway outages. Result data indicate that in the pressure condition, the HQES-LV can cut control waiting time down to 6.1 ms, hold the possibility of secret information leakage to 0.4%, and make the time of getting back to normal shorter to 6.7 s. Under a 1.2 p.u. load, it maintains 7.3 ms latency and 98.4% session establishment success. When QBER rises to 5.5%, the proposed scheme still preserves 58.9% effective key availability and 96.7% packet delivery. These findings indicate that practical quantum security for low-voltage systems should be realized through hierarchical orchestration rather than endpoint quantumization, and that the combination of QKD backbone supply, post-quantum fallback, and the adaptive session arrangement can provide a path that is more ready for deployment for future electric power communication networks.

Keywords
Low-voltage communication systems in next-generation data transmission networks connect smart meters, feeder controllers, EV chargers, and distributed energy resources; however, the dense topological structure they have and the limited abilities of their endpoints make the direct deployment on quantum hardware be not practical. In order to solve this restriction, this article puts forward a Hybrid Quantum Encryption Scheme for Low-Voltage Systems (HQES-LV), which keeps quantum key distribution on backbone and gateway layers, uses a post-quantum authenticated control plane, and gives lightweight session protection to edge devices by means of risk-adaptive key renewal. A literature-calibrated digital twin is constructed to simulate mixed control, telemetry, and maintenance traffic, along with replay attacks, man-in-the-middle probing, quantum channel degradation, and gateway outages. Result data indicate that in the pressure condition, the HQES-LV can cut control waiting time down to 6.1 ms, hold the possibility of secret information leakage to 0.4%, and make the time of getting back to normal shorter to 6.7 s. Under a 1.2 p.u. load, it maintains 7.3 ms latency and 98.4% session establishment success. When QBER rises to 5.5%, the proposed scheme still preserves 58.9% effective key availability and 96.7% packet delivery. These findings indicate that practical quantum security for low-voltage systems should be realized through hierarchical orchestration rather than endpoint quantumization, and that the combination of QKD backbone supply, post-quantum fallback, and the adaptive session arrangement can provide a path that is more ready for deployment for future electric power communication networks.

Related Articles

Huiqiao Liu1
1Yinchuan University of Energy, Ningxia, 750000, China
Xin Zhao1, Yan Li1, Xiangyang Cao1, Qiushuang Li1, Jianing Zhang1
1State Grid Shandong Electric Power Company Economic and Technological Research Institute ShanDong JiNan 250001, China
Dan Yang1
1School of Marxism, Suzhou Polytechnic University, Suzhou, 215104, China
Liuhang Shen1, Xiangwen Sun1
1Ulster college at Shaanxi University of Science &Technology, Xi’an,710021, Shaanxi, China