Outline

Ingegneria Sismica

Ingegneria Sismica

Study on the Evolutionary Path of U.S. Intelligence Ethics Standards

Author(s): Peng Li1, Shaozhong Wu1
1People’s Public Security University of China, Beijing 100038, Beijing, China
Li, Peng. and Wu, Shaozhong. “Study on the Evolutionary Path of U.S. Intelligence Ethics Standards.” Ingegneria Sismica Volume 43 Issue 2: 1-20, doi:10.65102/is2026693.

Abstract

Focusing on the issues of how the US intelligence ethics code evolves, how it stages and why it turns, this paper studies a multi-source corpus composed of legal and administrative documents, congressional reports, judicial precedents, decldeclfied archives, academic papers and think tank reports based on the framework of historical institutionalism and the method of computational text analysis. Through text preprocessing, TF-IDF feature representation, LDA topic modeling, time-series measurement of topic strength and turning point detection, eight core topics are identified, including national security, civil liberties, supervision mechanism, and technical ethics. The evolution of these core topics is divided into four stages: the foundation of Cold War authorization, the reconstruction of Watergate supervision, the swing back of counter-terrorism security, and the rebalance in the digital age. The results show that the intelligence ethics of the United States is not a linear progress, but a continuous adjustment among security, freedom, supervision and technology under the joint effect of external security pressure, domestic political crisis and technological change, showing the overall path characteristics of “authorization expansion – supervision modification – back swing – dynamic rebalance”. The research provides a computable, staged and interpretable analysis path for the research of information ethics, national security governance and technology governance.

Keywords
American intelligence ethics; Historical institutionalism; LDA topic modeling; Path of evolution

Related Articles

Lei Lei1, Chenxi Wang2, Hongmei Cai1, Dong Zhang3, Yusheng Zhang2, Qingyun Chen1
1State Grid (Xi’an) Environmental Protection Technology Center Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710100, Shaanxi, China
2Electric Power Research Institute of State Grid Shaanxi Electric Power Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710100, Shaanxi, China
3State Grid Shaanxi Electric Power Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710048, Shaanxi, China
Ruofan Xu1
1College of Finance and Investment, Financial Innovation and Risk Management Research Center, Hebei Finance University Baoding, 071000, Hebei, China
Li Lian1, Yongsong Huang2
1College of Physical Education, BEI JING WUZI University, BeiJing, 101149, BeiJing, China
2College of Teacher Education Normal College, Hezhou University, Hezhou 542899, Guangxi, China
Jun Lin1
1Zhengzhou University of Industry Technology,School of Art and Design; Zhengzhou 451100, Henan Province, China
Meng Lu1, Yaru Feng2
1Qufu Normal University, Qufu, 276800, Shandong, China
2Neusoft Institute Guangdong, Foshan, 528225, Guangdong, China