Outline

Ingegneria Sismica

Ingegneria Sismica

Analysis of determining the weights of risk assessment indexes for barracks facilities construction units in highland and alpine areas based on AHP hierarchical analysis method

Author(s): Peng Hu1
1Army Logistics Academy Chongqing 401311, Chongqing, China
Hu, Peng. “Analysis of determining the weights of risk assessment indexes for barracks facilities construction units in highland and alpine areas based on AHP hierarchical analysis method.” Ingegneria Sismica Volume 43 Issue 2: 1-18, doi:10.65102/is2026585.

Abstract

This research has constructed a risk assessment model which is used for camp facilities in high-altitude and alpine regions. This work carries out three stages: index starting establishment, choice checking, and modification to confirm the last risk evaluation indexes for the construction organization. After that, through utilizing the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) method, a judgment matrix is established through pairwise comparison of indicators on all levels. This matrix may assist the work of confirming the weight values of the evaluation indicators. Next, we utilize the fuzzy quantification method to carry out the fuzzy overall evaluation on the risk that relates to the agent construction unit for barracks installations in high-altitude and frigid mountain zones.One risk evaluation framework was by us developed for building construction units of barracks in high-altitude cold regions. This framework is constituted of five first-order metrics and thirteen second-order metrics. Inside one specific case study, we used the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to carry out the calculation of the weights. The average value weights got by arithmetic method of natural risks, economic risks, environmental risks, management risks, and security risks are therefore determined as 0.085, 0.165, 0.276, 0.429, and 0.045 each one respectively. In addition, the comprehensive weight values of the second-level indicators have been discovered to lie in the scope of 0.023 to 0.175.The fuzzy rating of the risk of the substitute unit shows that the scores of the risk factors are mostly concentrated between 2 and 4, which are in the category of general risk and greater risk.

Keywords
Risk evaluation model; AHP hierarchical analysis; fuzzy quantification; substitute construction unit; plateau alpine barracks

Related Articles

Qianwen Xiong1, Yuhong Chen1
1Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, School of Pharmaceutical Medicine, Guangzhou,Guangdong,China,510006
Zhihao Jiang1,2, Limi Chen1,2, Jing Yang1
1Hainan Vocational University of Science and Technology, Haikou 571126, China
2Institute for Mathematical Research, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
Limi Chen1,2, Zhihao Jiang1,2, Jing Yang1
1Hainan Vocational University of Science and Technology, Haikou 571126, China
2Institute for Mathematical Research, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
Hui Yuan1, Minjie Chai2, Siqing Xu1, Jinsong Li1, Jinwan Zheng1
1Electric Power Research Institute, State Grid Shanxi Electric Power Co., Ltd., Taiyuan, 030001, Shanxi, China
2Jincheng Power Supply Branch, State Grid Shanxi Electric Power Co., Ltd., Jincheng, 048000, Shanxi, China
Yanhan Zhu1,2
1China Academy of Cultural Heritage, Chaoyang District, 100029, Beijing, China
2Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Xicheng District, 100044, Beijing, China