Outline

Ingegneria Sismica

Ingegneria Sismica

Analysis of the seismic risk of major-hazard industrial plants and applicability of innovative seismic protection systems Part II: Steel liquid storage tanks with floating roof

, Maurizio De Angelis, Renato Giannini, Fabrizio Paolacci, Leonardi G. Luccone, Sergio Di Cave, Mariano Ciucci. “Analysis of the seismic risk of major-hazard industrial plants and applicability of innovative seismic protection systems Part II: Steel liquid storage tanks with floating roof.” Ingegneria Sismica Volume 27 Issue 1: -, doi:….

Abstract

In this paper the main results obtained within different research projects, developed about the applicability of seismic passive control of major-hazard industrial installations are shown. The work has been subdivided into two papers; in this second part the results relating to big steel tanks equipped with floating roof are presented. After a brief discussion about the seismic vulnerability of tanks and the study of the equations of motion of fixed and isolated base tanks, the main results of a series of shaking table tests, carried out on a steel tank with diameter of 4 m and filled with water up to 1m, are presented. The tank has been tested both in fixed base configuration with floating roof and seismically protected with elastomeric and elasto-plastic isolation devices. The results have confirmed the reliability of the simplified models and the high effectiveness of the base isolation systems in reducing the pressure on the tank wall and the relative stresses, also with floating roof. On the contrary, a low increasing of the oscillation amplitude of the liquid surface has been observed, partially compensated by an increasing of damping, which drastically reduces the number of the free oscillations of the floating roof, in the post-earthquake phase.

Related Articles

E. Brunesi1, S. Peloso1, R. Pinho1,2, R. Nascimbene3
1EUCENTRE, European Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake Engineering Via Ferrata 1, 27100 Pavia, Italy
2Dept. of Civil Engineering and Architecture (DICAr), University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 3, Pavia 27100, Italy
3Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS Pavia Piazza della Vittoria 15, 27100 Pavia, Italy
R. Arvind1, M. Helen Santhi1, G. Malathi2, Huseyin Bilgin3
1School of Civil Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
2School of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
3Civil (Structural) Engineering, Epoka University, Tirana / Albania
Ali Ekber Sever1, Yakup Hakan Aydin2, Pinar Usta Evci1
1Department of Civil Engineering, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, 32260 Isparta, Turkey
2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, 32260 Isparta, Turkey
Hayri Baytan Ozmen1, Esra Ozer2
1Department of Civil Engineering, Usak University, 64200 Usak, Turkey
2Department of Civil Engineering, Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University, 60250 Tokat, Turkey
Hamid Beiraghi1, Abolfazl Riahi Nouri2
1Department of Civil Engineering, Mahdishahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mahdishahr, Iran
2Department of Civil Engineering, West Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran