Outline

Ingegneria Sismica

Ingegneria Sismica

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE INELASTIC TENSILE BEHAVIOUR OF NON-PRELOADABLE GRADE 8.8 BOLTS

, Mario D’Aniello., , Roberto Tartaglia., and , David Cassiano. “EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE INELASTIC TENSILE BEHAVIOUR OF NON-PRELOADABLE GRADE 8.8 BOLTS.” Ingegneria Sismica Volume 37 Issue 2: 92-109, doi:….

Abstract

Non-preloadable grade 8.8 bolts are widely adopted in European market of steel constructions. EN 1993:1-8 provides design rules for bolted connections based on simplified elastic perfectly plastic response of bolts, disregarding their ultimate deformation capacity. In case of seismic design of bolted connections, the bolt response is assumed to be unaffected by cyclic loading, even though the quantification of both ductility and low-cycle fatigue is essential to avoid brittle failure of bolted joints. In order to investigate these features, experimental monotonic and both variable and constant amplitude cyclic tests are carried out on non-preloadable grade 8.8 SB (Structural Bolting) assemblies considering three different diameters (i.e. 16, 20 and 24 mm). The results from monotonic tests enable to characterize the force-displacement monotonic response and ductility. The results from variable amplitude cyclic tests allow quantifying the strength degradation induced by cyclic actions, while the constant amplitude low-cycle fatigue tests enabled to investigate the fatigue capacity at different plastic strain and to determine both ε-N (i.e. strain amplitude-number of cycles to failure) and ε/εy -N (i.e. imposed ductility-number of cycles to failure) curves.

Related Articles

E. Brunesi1, S. Peloso1, R. Pinho1,2, R. Nascimbene3
1EUCENTRE, European Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake Engineering Via Ferrata 1, 27100 Pavia, Italy
2Dept. of Civil Engineering and Architecture (DICAr), University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 3, Pavia 27100, Italy
3Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS Pavia Piazza della Vittoria 15, 27100 Pavia, Italy
R. Arvind1, M. Helen Santhi1, G. Malathi2, Huseyin Bilgin3
1School of Civil Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
2School of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
3Civil (Structural) Engineering, Epoka University, Tirana / Albania
Ali Ekber Sever1, Yakup Hakan Aydin2, Pinar Usta Evci1
1Department of Civil Engineering, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, 32260 Isparta, Turkey
2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, 32260 Isparta, Turkey
Hayri Baytan Ozmen1, Esra Ozer2
1Department of Civil Engineering, Usak University, 64200 Usak, Turkey
2Department of Civil Engineering, Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University, 60250 Tokat, Turkey
Hamid Beiraghi1, Abolfazl Riahi Nouri2
1Department of Civil Engineering, Mahdishahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mahdishahr, Iran
2Department of Civil Engineering, West Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran