Outline

Ingegneria Sismica

Ingegneria Sismica

QUSDRA APPROACH: QUICK SEISMIC DESIGN OF STEEL STORAGE RACKS

, Claudio Bernuzzi., , Stefanija Petrushevska., and , Marco Simoncelli. “QUSDRA APPROACH: QUICK SEISMIC DESIGN OF STEEL STORAGE RACKS.” Ingegneria Sismica Volume 39 Issue 1: 30-50, doi:….

Abstract

The paper is focused on the seismic performance of steel storage pallet racks, which represent a very competitive solution, widely used to store goods and materials. In particular, the design strategy herein proposed is based on a procedure which directly correlate the static and the seismic rack performance using the so-called Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) approach. Despite this approach is a well-established analysis method, generally used for defining the risk associated with seismic events, it is rarely employed in the routine design of steel racks. In fact, independently of the complexity of the racks under investigation, only the modal response spectrum analysis (MRSA) is usually adopted, neglecting hence some non-negligible peculiarities of these structures. This is mainly due to the lack of time during the design phases.
The proposed procedure, named QUSDRA (QUick Seismic Design of steel storage RAcks), allows designers to choose the more convenient structural solution by considering both costs and the key structural performance parameters (i.e. reduction of the load carrying capacity, transient interstorey drift and residual interstorey drift), with limited computational efforts. In fact, QUSDRA method is directly based on an IDA database which, once created, can be used for the rack design on different seismic area.
In order to better understand the key phases of the procedure, a step-by-step case study is presented, highlighting the main advantages associated with the proposed approach.

Related Articles

E. Brunesi1, S. Peloso1, R. Pinho1,2, R. Nascimbene3
1EUCENTRE, European Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake Engineering Via Ferrata 1, 27100 Pavia, Italy
2Dept. of Civil Engineering and Architecture (DICAr), University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 3, Pavia 27100, Italy
3Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS Pavia Piazza della Vittoria 15, 27100 Pavia, Italy
R. Arvind1, M. Helen Santhi1, G. Malathi2, Huseyin Bilgin3
1School of Civil Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
2School of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
3Civil (Structural) Engineering, Epoka University, Tirana / Albania
Ali Ekber Sever1, Yakup Hakan Aydin2, Pinar Usta Evci1
1Department of Civil Engineering, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, 32260 Isparta, Turkey
2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, 32260 Isparta, Turkey
Hayri Baytan Ozmen1, Esra Ozer2
1Department of Civil Engineering, Usak University, 64200 Usak, Turkey
2Department of Civil Engineering, Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University, 60250 Tokat, Turkey
Hamid Beiraghi1, Abolfazl Riahi Nouri2
1Department of Civil Engineering, Mahdishahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mahdishahr, Iran
2Department of Civil Engineering, West Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran