Outline

Ingegneria Sismica

Ingegneria Sismica

Research on the Application of Asset pricing methods Based on Market Efficient theory in the Securities market

Author(s): Xiaojiao Chen1
1College of Finance and Economics, Xinjiang Vocational and Technical University of Tianshan, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830000, China
Chen, Xiaojiao . “Research on the Application of Asset pricing methods Based on Market Efficient theory in the Securities market.” Ingegneria Sismica Volume 43 Issue 3: 1-13, doi:10.65102/is20261155.

Abstract

Along with the rapid progress of China’s securities market, the applicability of market efficiency and Asset pricing methods has become more and more prominent, and needs to be empirically analyzed and adapted with the characteristics of China’s securities market. Our research explores the application of Asset pricing methods under the market efficient theory in the China’s securities market. Through empirical analysis of 51 stocks in SSE, an adjusted CAPM method adapted to the characteristics of the Chinese market is constructed, and the validity of the SSE Composite Index is tested. The results show that there is a positive association between risk and return in the China’s securities market, but the explanatory effectiveness of systematic risk on the expected stock return is weak, with an R² value of only 0.0737, indicating that systematic risk only accounts for about 7% of the total risk. The market portfolio has the highest monthly average return in 2018 (8.6125‰), while the market portfolio has the lowest monthly average return in 2016 (- 0.9845‰). The study concludes that improving China’s securities market efficiency requires improving the information disclosure system, fostering institutional investors, and solving the problem of listed companies’ shareholding structure, which enhances the applicability of the CAPM method in China’s securities market.

Keywords
Market efficiency; Asset pricing method; CAPM; Systematic risk; Securities market; Risk premium

Related Articles

Liqin Zheng1, Dongrui Qing2, Yan Zhang1
1School of Mathematics and Statistics, Shaan Xi Xue Qian Normal University Xi’an 710100, P.R.China
2School of Marxism, Xi’an University of Finance and Economics Xi’an 710100, P.R.China
Yanan Gao1, Aiqun Peng2, Nina Ma2
1Management School of Anhui Business and Technology College Hefei 230000, Anhui, China
2Economics and Trade School of Anhui Business and Technology College Hefei 230000, Anhui, China
Ya’ning Liu1, Ping Ma1
1School of Teacher Education, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, 832000, China
Yuhui Li1, Zhongliang Gong1
1College of Mechanical and Intelligent Manufacturing, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, Hunan, 410004, China
Hanqing Hu1, Chengjin Liu1, Tianmu Tian1
1School of Management Science and Engineering, Beijing Information Science & Technology University, Beijing 100192