Outline

Ingegneria Sismica

Ingegneria Sismica

Quantitative Evaluation Model of the Policy Effectiveness of China’s Intangible Cultural Heritage: Based on Policy Text Mining Technology

Author(s): Ken Wang1, Jinhan Shu2, Kan Yuan1
1School of Digital Media, Shenzhen Polytechnic University, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China
2Postdoctoral Mobile Station of Journalism and communication, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, Shanghai, China
Wang, Ken ., Shu, Jinhan ., and Yuan, Kan . “Quantitative Evaluation Model of the Policy Effectiveness of China’s Intangible Cultural Heritage: Based on Policy Text Mining Technology.” Ingegneria Sismica Volume 43 Issue 3: 1-15, doi:10.65102/is20261297.

Abstract

In response to the problem that the current research on the effectiveness of China’s intangible cultural heritage protection policies mainly relies on qualitative analysis and lacks a systematic quantitative evaluation framework, this study constructs a policy effectiveness quantitative evaluation system that integrates text mining and PMC index models. Using 324 national and local intangible cultural heritage policy texts from 2005 to 2023 as samples, a standardized corpus is constructed using Python crawling and preprocessing techniques; Propose a composite mining framework that combines BERT semantic embedding with LDA topic modeling to extract deep policy semantics and topic structures; Based on 13 indicators from five dimensions including policy goal orientation, policy tools, implementation effectiveness, content innovation, and coordination ability, the PMC index model is used to conduct multidimensional quantitative evaluation. The results indicate that the intangible cultural heritage policy, with “protection and inheritance” as its core semantics, presents a dual track evolution feature of “technological empowerment+social collaboration”; LDA identifies five core themes: heritage conservation, digitization, public participation, industrial innovation, and cross regional collaboration; There are significant hierarchical differences in policy effectiveness, with national policies outperforming local policies in terms of implementation efficiency and coordination ability. The PMC index of the 14th Five Year Plan for the Protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage is the highest (4.125), while local policies are constrained by resources and have weaker tool allocation and innovation dimensions.

Keywords
Intangible Cultural Heritage; Policy Effectiveness Evaluation; Digital Technology; Text Mining; PMC Index Model

Related Articles

Yanhan Zhu1,2
1China Academy of Cultural Heritage, Chaoyang District, 100029, Beijing, China
2Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Xicheng District, 100044, Beijing, China
Jingze Sun1
1School of Fine Arts, Anqing Normal University, Anqing 246000, Anhui, China
Yajing Xu1, Ruixia Wang1
1College of Art & Design, Nanjing Forestry University, 210037
Xinyue Ma1
1Graduate School, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
Xiangyu Jiang1, Yanxin Lin2, Xin Hong2, Kun Hu2, Yijia Tang2
1School of General Education, Yango University, Fuzhou 350015, Fujian, China
2School of Metaverse and New Media, Yango University, Fuzhou, 350015, Fujian, China