Outline

Ingegneria Sismica

Ingegneria Sismica

Dynamic deduction of market behavior of electricity price formation mechanism in electricity market simulation system

Author(s): Tao Meng1, Le Liu2, Mingyu Che2, Zhenduo Gao2
1State Grid Jilin Electric Power Co, Ltd., Changchun 130000 Jilin Province, China
2Jilin Electric Power Trading Center Co., Ltd., Changchun 130021, Jilin Province, China
Meng, Tao. et al “Dynamic deduction of market behavior of electricity price formation mechanism in electricity market simulation system.” Ingegneria Sismica Volume 43 Issue 3: 1-22, doi:10.65102/is20261048.

Abstract

Under the background of increasing volatility of new energy and complex trading behavior, the formation of electricity price in power market has shown significant dynamic coupling characteristics. Aiming at the problem of insufficient description of the linkage between price generation process and agent behavior in traditional methods, this paper constructs a dynamic deduction method of market behavior of electricity price formation mechanism for electricity market simulation system, which integrates market data collection, scenario construction, feature representation, state modeling, multi-agent game and intelligent deduction mechanism into a unified computing framework. Based on Python 3.11 and PyTorch 2.2 platform, the experiment was carried out with continuous samples of 180 d and 15 min granularity. The results show that the root mean square error of the electricity price in this paper is 4.87 yuan /MWh, the average absolute percentage error is 3.96%, the price turning point capture rate is 88.4%, the market clearing rate is 94.6%, and the supply-demand deviation rate is 2.3%. The results show that the proposed method can better reveal the internal relationship between electricity price evolution and market behavior adjustment, and provide computational support for electricity market simulation analysis and rule optimization.

 

Keywords
Electricity market simulation; Electricity price formation mechanism; Multi-agent game; Dynamic deduction

Related Articles

Zhihao Jiang1,2, Limi Chen1,2, Jing Yang1
1Hainan Vocational University of Science and Technology, Haikou 571126, China
2Institute for Mathematical Research, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
Limi Chen1,2, Zhihao Jiang1,2, Jing Yang1
1Hainan Vocational University of Science and Technology, Haikou 571126, China
2Institute for Mathematical Research, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
Hui Yuan1, Minjie Chai2, Siqing Xu1, Jinsong Li1, Jinwan Zheng1
1Electric Power Research Institute, State Grid Shanxi Electric Power Co., Ltd., Taiyuan, 030001, Shanxi, China
2Jincheng Power Supply Branch, State Grid Shanxi Electric Power Co., Ltd., Jincheng, 048000, Shanxi, China
Yanhan Zhu1,2
1China Academy of Cultural Heritage, Chaoyang District, 100029, Beijing, China
2Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Xicheng District, 100044, Beijing, China
Ken Wang1, Jinhan Shu2, Kan Yuan1
1School of Digital Media, Shenzhen Polytechnic University, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China
2Postdoctoral Mobile Station of Journalism and communication, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, Shanghai, China