Outline

Ingegneria Sismica

Ingegneria Sismica

Data-driven aero-engine fault diagnosis fusion algorithm optimization and health management strategy

Author(s): Xiaolong Che1,2, Min Liu3, Jiao Li3
1School of Aerospace Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, Fujian, China
2Service Support Department, AECC South Industry Co., Ltd., Zhuzhou, 412002, Hunan, China
3Optoelectronic Technology Branch, AECC South Industry Co., Ltd., Zhuzhou,412002, Hunan, China
Che, Xiaolong ., Liu, Min ., and Li, Jiao . “Data-driven aero-engine fault diagnosis fusion algorithm optimization and health management strategy.” Ingegneria Sismica Volume 43 Issue 3: 1-26, doi:10.65102/is20261277.

Abstract

A data-driven fault diagnosis fusion algorithm and health management framework was proposed to solve the problems of asynchronism, feature redundancy and instability of weak fault recognition in multi-source monitoring data of aero-engine. Method The method takes 21 types of sensor variables and three types of working condition parameters as input. After abnormal correction, normalization, and sliding window coding, the channel sensitivity prior, adaptive weight allocation, and error feedback correction mechanism are introduced to form a fusion feature for fault classification, diagnostic confidence calculation, and health state assessment. The experimental results show that the model Accuracy is 96.37%, F1-score is 95.74%, AUC is 98.21%, and the average inference time is 19.8 ms. Compared with Transformer, the F1-score is improved by 2.55 percentage points and the inference time is reduced by 8.1 ms. Ablation results show that the adaptive weight and error correction contribute significantly to the performance of the model, which can support the stable transformation of fault identification results to maintenance strategy output.

Keywords
aero-engine; Fault diagnosis; Feature fusion; Health management

Related Articles

Liqin Zheng1, Dongrui Qing2, Yan Zhang1
1School of Mathematics and Statistics, Shaan Xi Xue Qian Normal University Xi’an 710100, P.R.China
2School of Marxism, Xi’an University of Finance and Economics Xi’an 710100, P.R.China
Yanan Gao1, Aiqun Peng2, Nina Ma2
1Management School of Anhui Business and Technology College Hefei 230000, Anhui, China
2Economics and Trade School of Anhui Business and Technology College Hefei 230000, Anhui, China
Ya’ning Liu1, Ping Ma1
1School of Teacher Education, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, 832000, China
Yuhui Li1, Zhongliang Gong1
1College of Mechanical and Intelligent Manufacturing, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, Hunan, 410004, China
Hanqing Hu1, Chengjin Liu1, Tianmu Tian1
1School of Management Science and Engineering, Beijing Information Science & Technology University, Beijing 100192