Outline

Ingegneria Sismica

Ingegneria Sismica

Constructing and Validating an AI-Empowered Evaluation Framework for Industry–Education Integration

Author(s): Xiaoyan Yu1, Jun Shen1
1ZheJiang Institute of Communications, Hangzhou, 311112, Zhejiang, China
Yu, Xiaoyan. and Shen, Jun. “Constructing and Validating an AI-Empowered Evaluation Framework for Industry–Education Integration.” Ingegneria Sismica Volume 43 Issue 3: 1-19, doi:10.65102/is20261068.

Abstract

In response to the problems of scattered indicators, insufficient result verification, and weak interpretability in the evaluation of industry education integration, this article constructs an artificial intelligence (AI) empowerment evaluation framework. Based on observations from 126 universities and 3010 questionnaires from 42 universities from 2022 to 2024, this study integrates five dimensions: collaborative governance, curriculum co construction, practical platform, process quality, and outcome effectiveness. Research combines Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Entropy Weight Method, and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) modeling. The results showed that the mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE) of the LightGBM model were 0.138 and 0.189, respectively, with a coefficient of determination (R ²) of 0.814; The framework score has a significant positive impact on the corresponding employment rate, enterprise satisfaction, and collaborative innovation output. The key driving factors for high-quality industry education integration are the participation intensity of enterprise mentors, the coverage rate of curriculum co construction, and the proportion of dual teacher teachers, indicating that the deep participation of enterprises in curriculum and practice is more important.

Keywords
Integration evaluation of industry and education; artificial intelligence empowerment; LightGBM; external validation of efficacy standards; interpretability analysis

Related Articles

Liqin Zheng1, Dongrui Qing2, Yan Zhang1
1School of Mathematics and Statistics, Shaan Xi Xue Qian Normal University Xi’an 710100, P.R.China
2School of Marxism, Xi’an University of Finance and Economics Xi’an 710100, P.R.China
Yanan Gao1, Aiqun Peng2, Nina Ma2
1Management School of Anhui Business and Technology College Hefei 230000, Anhui, China
2Economics and Trade School of Anhui Business and Technology College Hefei 230000, Anhui, China
Ya’ning Liu1, Ping Ma1
1School of Teacher Education, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, 832000, China
Yuhui Li1, Zhongliang Gong1
1College of Mechanical and Intelligent Manufacturing, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, Hunan, 410004, China
Hanqing Hu1, Chengjin Liu1, Tianmu Tian1
1School of Management Science and Engineering, Beijing Information Science & Technology University, Beijing 100192