Outline

Ingegneria Sismica

Ingegneria Sismica

Design of a Visual Thinking Training System via the Synergistic Integration of Cognitive Diagnostic Models and Generative Adversarial Networks

Author(s): Zixuan Jing1, Boon Keat Ooi2
1Shazhou Professional Institute of Technology, Zhangjiagang City, Jiangsu Province, 215600, China
2Graduate School of Management, Postgraduate Centre, Management and Science University, University Drive, Off Persiaran Olahraga, 40100 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
Jing, Zixuan. and Ooi, Boon Keat. “Design of a Visual Thinking Training System via the Synergistic Integration of Cognitive Diagnostic Models and Generative Adversarial Networks.” Ingegneria Sismica Volume 43 Issue 2: 1-20, doi:10.65102/is20261029.

Abstract

Visual thinking represents a multifaceted cognitive ability critical to learning in scientific, engineering, design, and data-centric disciplines. Existing online learning platforms measure visual thinking using overall accuracy indices without providing insights into the fine-grained cognitive factors contributing to learners’ learning problems. This paper proposes a visual thinking training platform that integrates Cognitive Diagnostic Modeling (CDM) and Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) technologies to solve this problem. It disaggregates visual thinking into five diagnosable cognitive factors—visual perception, spatial relationship understanding, pattern abstraction, visual inference, and representation transformation—and matches training tasks to cognitive attributes using a Q matrix. The neural network-based CDM model provides individual-level attribute proficiency profiles, and the conditional GAN produces and supplements visual training tasks according to diagnosed weak cognitive abilities constrained by attribute labels, difficulty levels, and domain experts’ evaluation. A quasi-experiment was carried out among 124 college students in six weeks. The findings suggest that the integrated CDM-GAN framework significantly outperforms the traditional fixed-task-based approach on all cognitive factors (p < .001; partial eta-squared between .22 and .31), with enhanced transfer task performance (F = 42.67, p < .001; partial eta-squared = .29) and lower cognitive load (effect size = 0.79). Domain expert evaluations indicated the acceptability of the quality of generated tasks concerning attribute matching and instructional value. Overall, our research demonstrates the significant advantages of an evidence-based adaptive platform supported by automatic task generation in visual thinking training.

Keywords
visual thinking; cognitive diagnostic models; generative adversarial networks; adaptive learning systems; Q-matrix

Related Articles

Huiqiao Liu1
1Yinchuan University of Energy, Ningxia, 750000, China
Xin Zhao1, Yan Li1, Xiangyang Cao1, Qiushuang Li1, Jianing Zhang1
1State Grid Shandong Electric Power Company Economic and Technological Research Institute ShanDong JiNan 250001, China
Dan Yang1
1School of Marxism, Suzhou Polytechnic University, Suzhou, 215104, China
Liuhang Shen1, Xiangwen Sun1
1Ulster college at Shaanxi University of Science &Technology, Xi’an,710021, Shaanxi, China