Outline

Ingegneria Sismica

Ingegneria Sismica

The Bidirectional Relationship Between Corporate ESG Performance and Generative AI Governance: An Institutional Theory Perspective

Author(s): Song Tan1,2
1School of Economics and Management, Huainan Normal University, Huainan, Anhui, 232038, China
2Graduate School, University of Perpetual Help System DALTA, Calamba, 1746, Philippines
Tan, Song. “The Bidirectional Relationship Between Corporate ESG Performance and Generative AI Governance: An Institutional Theory Perspective.” Ingegneria Sismica Volume 43 Issue 1: 1-16, doi:10.65102/is2026140.

Abstract

Under the conditions of constantly rising uncertainties in the development of the global economy and society, it becomes increasingly important to study the relationship between corporate ESG performance and generative AI governance. For this reason, the purpose of this study is to investigate the mutually causal relationship between corporate ESG performance (ESG) and generative AI governance (GAI) on the basis of institutional theory. Based on previous literature and theoretical analysis, four research hypotheses were formulated, and, at the same time, the sample size was selected, along with the source of information about the companies being analyzed. In this model of regression analysis, the effects of the dependent variables, independent variables, mediators, control variables, and moderators on one another are reflected. The regression model of analysis is used to verify the stated research hypotheses. When all other factors remain unchanged, there exists a significant mutual correlation of corporation ESG performance (ESG) and generative AI governance (GAI), which verifies hypotheses H1 and H2. Despite the presence of the enterprise life cycle (ELC) and industry classification (IC) in the analysis, a significant mutual correlation of corporation ESG performance (ESG) and generative AI governance (GAI) still exists.

Keywords
ESG; generative AI; regression model; institutional theory

Related Articles

Huiqiao Liu1
1Yinchuan University of Energy, Ningxia, 750000, China
Xin Zhao1, Yan Li1, Xiangyang Cao1, Qiushuang Li1, Jianing Zhang1
1State Grid Shandong Electric Power Company Economic and Technological Research Institute ShanDong JiNan 250001, China
Dan Yang1
1School of Marxism, Suzhou Polytechnic University, Suzhou, 215104, China
Liuhang Shen1, Xiangwen Sun1
1Ulster college at Shaanxi University of Science &Technology, Xi’an,710021, Shaanxi, China